From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 13 16:27:01 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA08121 for current-outgoing; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:27:01 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA08115 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:26:57 -0800 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id QAA25869; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:26:25 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199511140026.QAA25869@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: ISP state their FreeBSD concerns To: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:26:25 -0800 (PST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199511132237.RAA17770@crh.cl.msu.edu> from "Charles Henrich" at Nov 13, 95 05:37:58 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 499 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > A couple of months back Matt Dillion was here (-hackers actually) talking about > this same (similar?) problem which he had tracked down to the VM system, and > even provided a solution, that seems to have been sat on. Matt is a really > really sharp guy, perhaps we should take a closer look at what he has done? I don't think it was 'Sat on'.. 2.1 was happenning.... hopefully there is a backlog of such things that will now happen now that the main vm people can breath again.... julian