From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 30 16:34:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EA7ECD; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E77135D; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (nucleus.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:ff:29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1611623F840; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:34:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 onyx.glenbarber.us 1611623F840 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:34:29 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: dt71@gmx.com Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA Message-ID: <20130630163429.GC9211@glenbarber.us> References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <51CEEE8E.8010800@gmx.com> <20130629143032.GB10180@glenbarber.us> <51D03E0D.3050106@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51D03E0D.3050106@gmx.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: webmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:34:41 -0000 --5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:17:49PM +0200, dt71@gmx.com wrote: > On 06/29/2013 16:30, Glen Barber wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:26:22PM +0200, dt71@gmx.com wrote: > >>Tick, tock. > > > >Yes? >=20 > - What has so far been gained through the use of GA? > - Of these, which ones could not have been achieved otherwise, such as wi= th a different tool? > - Also of these, which ones are significant, and why? > - What warrants the continued application of GA? Yes, I saw your questions. What does 'tick tock' mean? Glen --5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR0F4VAAoJEFJPDDeguUajuZUH/R1KGObyHLveCIci790TSJWt 8ZEQGBKTVB/sIxhCt3X2aSSc3ws54/JnWd1O0GolHObfG+wGTuc4BfLW4zFBNphM EkadB9ABWuaP3m8dkezewf9bqDqLDb45XoFZh0MRcZWHNUpq4kc25hn3XtUINy/n +nspLlHG26XLZ5lNRmNtkbu5nr667jOut4+jdm3wkCA5+5BlUilbL1XNsk1EP/HN pXFeG9tWXBDCexoBSJOY2NnxoqmGSkH7f5bxHd6t6vqA+iUJmtIIHd6+ktUNLsJI 5zdOT/H1qVbXzQrV6QpI3cOzJIJs3M/7BWzsa4lXHsC9J00Jg3yDudXzfeUTj3s= =LE5P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5oH/S/bF6lOfqCQb--