From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 15 02:00:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCD716A4CE for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:00:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (mail-gw0.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37F543D1D for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7F20846008948; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:00:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7F208Mu074574; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:00:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost)i7F207JQ074571; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:00:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:00:07 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040815025803.H71436@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <20040814095829.W51109@ury.york.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top of tree kernel panics on Ultra 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:00:11 -0000 On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 10:06 AM +0100 8/14/04, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > >I've just updated my Ultra 5 (which was running a kernel > >from February) to top-of-tree CURRENT, but the new kernel > >won't boot. > > Hmm. Doesn't that mean you are going from a "32-bit time_t" > to a "64-bit time_t"? Did you follow all the steps for > making that transition? That change happened on March 10th. No - probably should have said, but never thought... The old kernel is 64 bit time_t. I was one of the pre-change testers... Gavin