Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:50:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195219] [maintainer] textproc/ibus build error Message-ID: <bug-195219-13-8eo2fFU8os@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-195219-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-195219-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195219 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch-ready CC|marino@FreeBSD.org | Status|New |Open --- Comment #9 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Henry Hu from comment #8) I'll accept that output and promote the PR. > Since redports is down, I have no way to perform better tests other > than building & installing & running check-plist. fyi, redports is considered less than useless at this point, so even if it were functioning, "passing redports" doesn't mean anything. Hopefully an upgrade will fix redports, I have no ETA on that. Is it required for every port maintainer to run a poudriere? officially, no. If you want me to promote, then pretty much yes. Other reviewers are less stringent. If you want to get your PRs cherry-picked, submit test logs without asking. Those get promoted first. Is there any facilities for maintainers to test new versions? local poudriere is best right now. Your check-plist / stage-qa output is mildly acceptable but it doesn't test everything and can be contaminated by live system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195219-13-8eo2fFU8os>