From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 5 15:38:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bonjour.cc.columbia.edu (bonjour.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA1514DC8 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:38:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuyman@confusion.net) Received: from confusion.net (dialup-11-9.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.36.245]) by bonjour.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA12437; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 18:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37093AC2.9D359031@confusion.net> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 18:35:46 -0400 From: Laurence Berland Organization: B.R.A.T.T. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MAXMEM, 512M memory References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Could it be that you want (512*1024) instead? I'm not sure where 2014 came from, but its 1024k to a meg. Mark wrote: > I have two machines (Pentium II 400, Intel BX mobo) with 512M RAM in each > of them. I recompiled both kernels with 'MAXMEM=(512*2014)'. I have also > removed the BOUNCE_BUFFERS option from the kernel config since it seems > this has caused problems for some. > > The situation is this: both machines boot normally, operate normally, and > appear to be stable when under a normally operating load. However, > according to /var/run/dmesg.boot, only 384M are detected by the system. > In both cases the BIOS accurately detects two 256M DIMMS. Somewhere, 128M > has been lots. > > Ideas? > > Thanks, > -Mark. > > --------------------------------------------------- > Mark Rekai - INetU, Inc.(tm) - http://www.INetU.net > Electronic commerce - Web development - Web hosting > maxiter@INetU.net - Phone: (610) 266-7441 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Laurence Berland, Stuyvesant HS Debate <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. http://stuy.debate.net icq #7434346 aol imer E1101 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message