From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 19 22:33:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6952F14D95 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:33:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA84730; Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:31:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 22:31:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: myers@iname.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'ipfw fwd' question: Shouldn't this work? In-Reply-To: <199906191735.KAA05356@sol.> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 myers@iname.com wrote: > I'm looking at the 'ipfw forward' mechanism, hoping to use it to > automatically route packets on my firewall's port 80 to an internal web > server's port 80. From what I see in mailing list archives, many people > have got exactly this situation working correctly. I can't seem to > figure out what I've done wrong. This sounds like a job for natd more than ipfw fwd. Are you running fake IPs inside your network? Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message