From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 9 13:06:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA05623 for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 13:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05601 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 13:06:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.8.8/frmug-2.1/nospam) with UUCP id WAA12328 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:06:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.8/keltia-2.13/nospam) id WAA03330; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:05:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto) Message-ID: <19971209220505.49592@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:05:05 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: Interaction between truss(1) and ktrace(1) ? References: <19971209203634.38303@keltia.freenix.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <19971209203634.38303@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 08:36:34PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#3883 AMD-K6 MMX @ 208 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Ollivier Robert: > I have a very recent kernel (with the latest procfs fixes from Sean) and it > has KTRACE defined in it. The main problem I have is that truss does > execute the command but doesn't show anything... Pilot error. /sys/sys/pioctl.h was good whereas /usr/include/sys/pioctl.h was bad (old definition). Running happily truss(1) now, thank to Sean. *-<:-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #19: Tue Dec 9 20:17:10 CET 1997