From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue May 4 16:20:18 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783F85F82A7 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FZQ6m5knsz3kBv for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Ports recompile for 13.0-RELEASE From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: <8093cca5-520e-436f-4a7d-8ce1bf680ca7@klop.ws> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:20:14 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9182B8A2-3359-44CD-A99C-3F04D3E3772D@kreme.com> References: <8093cca5-520e-436f-4a7d-8ce1bf680ca7@klop.ws> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FZQ6m5knsz3kBv X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[65.121.55.42:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[65.121.55.42:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 16:20:18 -0000 On 04 May 2021, at 09:00, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 5/4/21 4:10 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> With the move to FreeBSD 13.0 is there a simple (single step) way to = reinstall all the current ports other than saving off a list of the = ports and then stepping through that list to reinstall them? It was very = inefficient when moving to 12.0 as many ports in the list, of course, = were dependent on other ports, but then got recompiled, sometimes = multiple times. I know I ended up in a make loop where came was compiled = over and over again until I aborted, listed the current ports, differ on = the previous ports, and picked a port I though would have a lot of reps = to restart the compile. I then did this several more times to get back = to where I had been on 11.x >=20 > I used "portmaster -fa" in the past. Yeah, that's what I tried wen moving to 12.0 from 11.4 and it left a lot = of cleaning up. >> (And yes, I've tried moving to poudrerie several times and we do not = get on. At all.) >=20 > Might help to do another attempt. Especially if you are using custom = port settings instead of pkgs. It just doesn't work the way my brain works, and I don't have a bunch of = servers I need to keep updated, and the two servers I am running are = different architecture. Something as simple as "hey, I want to install = this one port" seemed overly complicated. I can see it's great when you = have a cluster of servers and want to manage the updates on a dedicated = server, but I don't need that. That said: # pkg-static upgrade -f # portmaster install postfix dovecot=20 So far, so good (I thought I would have to also redo MariaDB but it all = seems to be working now, mail did not work until I recompiled Dovecot = and Postfix, but I was expecting that. So far the only thing that is new is an error about pam_opie, but that's = for a new thread. --=20 Incredible! One of the worst performances of my career and they never doubted it for a second.