From owner-cvs-all Tue Oct 6 02:47:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA12758 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:47:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA12711; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:46:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joerg@FreeBSD.org) From: Joerg Wunsch Received: (from joerg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id CAA22534; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810060946.CAA22534@freefall.freebsd.org> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/daily 430.status-rwho Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk joerg 1998/10/06 02:46:46 PDT Modified files: etc/periodic/daily 430.status-rwho Log: Avoid the ``ruptime: no hosts in /var/rwho.'' message by not calling rwho iff /var/rwho is empty. Call `uptime' instead. This doesn't belong under `network' right away, but at least reports the same informaton about the local system. rwhod is not turned on by default (for good reason), and i've already seen too many of the above messages... Revision Changes Path 1.2 +7 -2 src/etc/periodic/daily/430.status-rwho