From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 16 13:34:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C92914E46 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 13:34:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id FAA29619; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:30:12 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37179AB9.2275475F@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:16:57 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Somers Cc: Luoqi Chen , camel@avias.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: some news about ftp hangs References: <199904161903.UAA00879@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers wrote: > > Now I think I'm confused ;-} I haven't seen any changes to ftp.... > I did the double lookup bit to all the stuff in libexec (including > ftpd), but that shouldn't effect what's going on here. If the > external NS record for Louqi's machine isn't supposed to be on that > machine, then we shouldn't have seen a DNS query (maybe named is only > binding to the internal IP - hence the ICMP unreachable bit). It looked too easy a suspect at this late at night. Sorry. The changes related to logging, and would not touch ftp, only ftpd. I was just confused by a recent problem I had with telnet client doing a reverse name lookup. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message