From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 16 06:18:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4C065BA4D for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G4Zkp6kGZz4kDG for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:18:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix, from userid 1237) id EC5454E657; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:18:41 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why doesn't cc -ansi disable conflicting type for getline from stdio.h? In-Reply-To: <4018acc9-2607-67ed-0327-8a3c9bc647b8@panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27605.1623824321.1@segfault.tristatelogic.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 23:18:41 -0700 Message-ID: <27606.1623824321@segfault.tristatelogic.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G4Zkp6kGZz4kDG X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rfg@tristatelogic.com designates 69.62.255.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rfg@tristatelogic.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[69.62.255.118:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tristatelogic.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[69.62.255.118:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.988]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14051, ipnet:69.62.128.0/17, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 06:18:43 -0000 In message <4018acc9-2607-67ed-0327-8a3c9bc647b8@panix.com>, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: >The boundary between C and Unix has always been blurred a little in >practice. It's good to keep the boundary clear in your mind... But but but...that's no longer necessary now that EVERYTHING is UNIX, right? So if you have a C compiler, and it isn't cross targeting for some embedded sysetem, then you likely have all of the UNIX primitives and all of the standard UNIX anmd POSIX C libraries at your disposal. Didn't a read a few years ago that Windoze had basically absorbed all of UNIX and that it now provides al of the same stuff, via libraries? Or maybe I misunderstood. It certainly seemed consistant with Microsoft's well publicised "embrace, extend, and destroy" philosophy at the time I read that. Regards, rfg