From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 18:03:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F0A16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from athena.softcardsystems.com (mail.softcardsystems.com [12.34.136.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC23043D2F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sah@softcardsystems.com) Received: from athena (athena [12.34.136.114])i8GJ2c74029881; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:02:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:02:38 -0500 (EST) From: Sam X-X-Sender: sah@athena To: Gary Corcoran In-Reply-To: <4149D73C.5030309@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <41483C97.2030303@fer.hr> <4149D73C.5030309@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:03:03 -0000 On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Gary Corcoran wrote: > Sam wrote: > >> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Jan Grant wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Sam wrote: >>> >>>> Let's suppose you generate an exabyte of storage per year. Filling a >>>> 64-bit >>>> filesystem would take you approximately 8 million years. >>> >>> >>> Hang on, I'm not sure I know where these numbers are coming from. >>> >>> 1PB is - what? 2^50 bytes? That looks closer to 2^64 than your >>> figures indicate. I'd imagine an exabyte a year ought to be topping out >>> after 16 years. I'm missing about half-a-dozen orders of magnitude >>> somewhere it seems. >> >> >> 1PB is indeed 2^50 bytes, but filesystems don't address on the byte, >> but on the block (1K, 4K, 8k, ...). The numbers I'm using assume >> the filesystem addresses on the sector, which is unrealistically >> small. Jack it up to a 16K blocksize and you jump a few hundred >> ZB in size. > > You have to be able to *seek* on a byte boundary. Hence doesn't a > "64-bit" filesystem indeed mean "only" 2^64 bytes? Only for the file you're seeking on. Sam