From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 5 14:37:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (mta.xtra.co.nz [203.96.92.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8BB14BE7 for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 14:37:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker ([210.55.152.128]) by mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v04.00.02.07 201-227-108) with SMTP id <19990505213955.KWWB7202931.mta1-rme@wocker> for ; Thu, 6 May 1999 09:39:55 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: chat@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 09:37:54 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: PCWeek article by Anne Chen -- Comments Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz In-reply-to: <4.2.0.37.19990505143833.04511280@localhost> References: <199905051822.NAA12099@free.pcs> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990505213955.KWWB7202931.mta1-rme@wocker> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 5 May 99, at 14:42, Brett Glass wrote: > At 01:22 PM 5/5/99 -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > >Provide _constructive_ guidance and leadership. > > I've tried. Unfortunately, this is difficult when the NOMINAL leadership > opposes effective tactics. To be fair: From what I've read, it is not only the "NOMINAL leadership" which opposes your tactics. It appears to be much wider than the leadership. As for "effective tactics", it is the definitiion of effective which appears to be in dispute. Specifically the tactics you propose (and which presumably you assume to be effective) are not deemed to be effective by large numbers of people. -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message