From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 3 16:24:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF30D106566B; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC89A8FC15; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA07996; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:24:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <506C66A6.4070003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:24:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Bruno References: <504EDBEB.6010104@FreeBSD.org> <1349198313.4246.3.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <506C38CE.4090400@FreeBSD.org> <1349281266.13749.0.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1349281266.13749.0.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "sbruno@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: notify userland about C-state changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:24:12 -0000 on 03/10/2012 19:21 Sean Bruno said the following: > On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 06:08 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>> So quick question, does this happen a lot on a system with a >> sporadic >>> workload? Does this introduce overhead to the system to service the >>> notification requests? >> >> I am not sure who can answer this question. It is up to ACPI platform >> to decide >> when it changes _available C-states_. OS doesn't have control over >> that. >> > Hrm ... what changes to the machine would make this happen while the > machine is running? things like the switching from battery to line > power? Yes. Or something else [?] of similar nature/effect. >> P.S. I hope you haven't confused this notification for a notification >> about >> _current_ C-state changing. > > I did have it confused. Thanks for putting this note in. OK :-) -- Andriy Gapon