From owner-freebsd-arch  Sat Sep  2  9:15:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from cybercable.fr (r121m50.cybercable.tm.fr [195.132.121.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E837B423
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Sep 2000 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mux@localhost)
	by cybercable.fr (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e82GI7713462
	for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 18:18:07 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mux)
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 18:18:07 +0200
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: thought about allocation of the first 1024th ports
Message-ID: <20000902181807.B13029@cybercable.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Sorry to reply to myself, but I've thought of the capabilities system. Can this help to
do what I am trying to do ? I've seen some #ifdef CAPABILITIES and CAP_KILL macros that
makes me think capabilities work on FreeBSD.

Maxime Henrion


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message