From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Oct 6 21:18:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F98710C6F37 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265968496C for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DEAF710C6F34; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD45810C6F31 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691A38495F for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05FA11840 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w96LIDA3012047 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w96LIDn5012046 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 21:18:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230355] [exp-run] Against projects/clang700-import branch Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 21:18:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 21:18:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230355 --- Comment #26 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Mark Linimon from comment #25) > Surely we can't be considering this. LLD hasn't been extensively tested in the wild (before FreeBSD). Newer may = need less LLD_UNSAFE. Explicitly rejecting -z is better than silently accepting it to prevent runtime bugs. > On the last headamd64PR230355-default run, neither gnome, kde, > samba, openoffice, nor qemu built. IMVHO that constitutes a > "don't-ship". Users don't usually install from /release_ but /quarterly. The latter is= a moving target. By the time 12.0-RELEASE more ports can be fixed. How many ports builds shouldn't be very important from base system POV. The primary concern is catching toolchain bugs (e.g., bug 230622 or bug 230412)= , so consumers (not just ports) don't have to invent gross workarounds. Obviousl= y, too few ports building would prevent enough exposure. However, if you need a stable compiler stick to a specific devel/llvm* on all FreeBSD versions. Why FreeBSD release engineering is still driven by ports/ freezes, something wh= ich was abolished years ago? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=