From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 11 09:40:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569471065696
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458A48FC2F;
	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <48772AA5.6000103@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:40:53 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>
References: <48736130.3090400@FreeBSD.org>
	<20080711.124154.13722130.chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080711.124154.13722130.chat95@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Need for openoffice -RC ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:40:55 -0000

Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
> Subject: Need for openoffice -RC ports
> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:44:32 +0200
> 
>> Why do we still have the openoffice -RC ports?  Even one openoffice 
>> package puts an extreme load on the package cluster (let alone 6!), so 
>> I'd suggest they be disabled or removed if they are not currently 
>> useful.
> 
> openoffice.org-2-RC port has been marked as IGNORE. 
> 2.4.2 is possible but I'm not sure so I just left as IGNORE.
> 
> openoffice.org-3-RC port will be marked as IGNORE soon.
> I'll update to 3.0.0beta2, openoffice.org-3 port, and
> then I'll mark as IGNORE the 3-RC.
> 
> openoffice.org-2-devel port has been marked as IGNORE, because
> development has been moved to 3-devel.
> and openoffice.org-3-devel port is active.
> 
> So now, we have six ports, three are marked as IGNORE.
 >
>>  Also perhaps one or both of the devel ports can be disabled 
>> until there is a significant need for it.
> 
> Yes, I ususally mark them as IGNORE if release branch is active.

Thanks, that's a big help!

Kris