From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 13 10:19:14 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E657106566C;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:19:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AD414E545;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F100521.7040005@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:19:13 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
References: <CA+dUSyrV_j8GtxS4=yN-DsFCprQ7N+EmuRoraDwBLZN1EFFR9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F100209.2010900@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F100209.2010900@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:19:14 -0000

On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
> kernel incompatible changes were introduced?

Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch.


Doug

-- 

	You can observe a lot just by watching.	-- Yogi Berra

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/