From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Fri Oct 30 07:41:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E489CA21A39; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ABEE1DE9; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so5260914wme.0; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:41:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TYArdvR25vT6J/bRYgYnZimUisICUCKXYXnZhKkYJPU=; b=hSQNGNPC7QYo9N62jMuOvZCUen0ltFSGex0Mx6JzwVL0jDFhZa3PYrb4od6P2BloEz QNvlcI/6IhCIR7cIn4duAxBAVHkKi1F28HYx6sK4HalshJlksQHfpQE2Hkh2/rnBdnd1 pXcnaOGLW550kjS66TkbBCib0/2BCF3xcAleI90nTwqdltQxvnrarTq/MPWjTMaP0MLi nS7F1ffCqks5nqmqClwILz6A8FGa7edMbXhGRGFWpzxegM28sm6g6ksX/BcQdMZ2VF2J AfLyy2fpS0YNv40k65tmLyBEnqblUnPQ12w16dDLXGO5rw6R/YiuCUaGR6boV9/n+Oxj ZCVQ== X-Received: by 10.28.134.134 with SMTP id i128mr1788559wmd.50.1446190893816; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p4FCA66C0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.202.102.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lv4sm5621591wjb.43.2015.10.30.00.41.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:41:26 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: svn commit: r290003 - head/sys/ofed/include/linux Message-ID: <20151030084126.53f7ffce@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <56323B33.8020505@selasky.org> References: <201510261328.t9QDSYRT076892@repo.freebsd.org> <56302F9D.2020308@freebsd.org> <56308289.4050902@selasky.org> <20151029143651.GN97830@FreeBSD.org> <56323B33.8020505@selasky.org> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:41:36 -0000 On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:28:51 +0100 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 10/29/15 15:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >> The LinuxKPI is not a binary compatibility module, and will at some > > H> point have API's diverging from Linux, to fit BSD API's better. > > > > This statement makes the name of LinuxKPI quite pointless, as well > > as the whole idea of the KPI unclear. > > Hi, > > To be more clear. Adding bind_irq_to_cpu() is more an exception than the > default. A the moment I think Linux doesn't have an equivalent of this > function, because of Linux's interrupt model. > My question is whether a "normal" FreeBSD user has any reason to enable LinuxKPI now or in the future. -- Gary Jennejohn