From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Nov  1 12:56:11 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA27720
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:56:11 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA27715
          ; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:56:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA01356; Wed, 1 Nov 1995 12:53:46 -0800
To: paul@netcraft.co.uk
cc: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer), vince@apollo.COSC.GOV,
        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        FAQ@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Nov 1995 20:46:56 GMT."
             <199511012047.UAA00447@alpha.netcraft.co.uk> 
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 1995 12:53:45 -0800
Message-ID: <1353.815259225@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> I think it would probably make sense for stable to continue as a 2.1
> lineage until such time as current is felt stable enough to become a release
> candidate. If current is in development a long time there may be a 2.1.1
> release or even a 2.1.2

Substitute "may be" for "almost certainly will be" and I think you're
closer to the mark! :)

					Jordan