From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 30 11:52:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2A3106564A
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:52:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C017B8FC14
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:52:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so534707bkc.13
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=MriBTkdUOa4RbdqOCizNn1i8BrknkyDV84m1/HobqrI=;
	b=oMpC9FVW3Z9JucEz9RcIdZ8AgfzJ1MWU8C/qwNx9vDHyD5GJJ0txgIS7mEAtjs/lPU
	k1LDlOe6Xk4BFJdO0Vo5oEazzfq4J67rKyV+K3ecn2sQ8aL3bmBgvbqlDIc7ySPKKTVF
	hRKo0CguqbzLgMTsAJYAdXPsByuTSAYDRLMZw0Dmuf1oN9BZ61tDDa6H78jaJkDZrArT
	PoHY6NIEGrsQlulInKOcixqH30on6dT+R8Vb2kI1qBmqIQHtVzN5OURsIGartfWmecds
	DPm8opoXPSHnTx0UJ9nz8kZUY1vTqP/JGEb7nDuYIWICsTBoqlvlKpTLWqRn+fMo23yF
	VqDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.117.15 with SMTP id fk15mr800231bkc.133.1333108347717;
	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU+vLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPSTskvLbixeyYW9BWFR0bSfJ3+r59ZYHHLyJAaYFERobO6O=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<0685CC3A-753B-4C5B-9E15-C0565B48F885@ultra-secure.de>
	<CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU+vLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:52:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CADLo83-4YFq36SmNXeAAGYS-w8_NeWg_jnvif=ojXLR4XRfnNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: jailed NFS server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:52:29 -0000

On 29 Mar 2012 03:13, "Beeblebrox" <zaphod@berentweb.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe I will give unfs3 a try. However, One of the reasons I'm trying to
> set it up is to be able to run Tinderbox on that jail for distributed
> compiling. When I did a little searching about unfs3 + Tinderbox + jail,
it
> came up with posts about problems and that such setup "does not give good
> results".
> Any feedback about such setup? Also, is such "bad performance result" also
> valid for all types of HPC/parallel computing run from jails so that "Just
> Run From Host" becomes the defaul solution in these cases?
>

Jails aren't really virtualised, so performance shouldn't be an issue.

Look at the Tinderbox README for how to run it in a jail; until nullfs is
jail-safe it's impossible to do 'properly'- you have to fake around it by
chrooting tinderd.

Chris