Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:52:27 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jailed NFS server Message-ID: <CADLo83-4YFq36SmNXeAAGYS-w8_NeWg_jnvif=ojXLR4XRfnNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU%2BvLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPSTskvLbixeyYW9BWFR0bSfJ3%2Br59ZYHHLyJAaYFERobO6O=w@mail.gmail.com> <0685CC3A-753B-4C5B-9E15-C0565B48F885@ultra-secure.de> <CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU%2BvLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 Mar 2012 03:13, "Beeblebrox" <zaphod@berentweb.com> wrote: > > Maybe I will give unfs3 a try. However, One of the reasons I'm trying to > set it up is to be able to run Tinderbox on that jail for distributed > compiling. When I did a little searching about unfs3 + Tinderbox + jail, it > came up with posts about problems and that such setup "does not give good > results". > Any feedback about such setup? Also, is such "bad performance result" also > valid for all types of HPC/parallel computing run from jails so that "Just > Run From Host" becomes the defaul solution in these cases? > Jails aren't really virtualised, so performance shouldn't be an issue. Look at the Tinderbox README for how to run it in a jail; until nullfs is jail-safe it's impossible to do 'properly'- you have to fake around it by chrooting tinderd. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-4YFq36SmNXeAAGYS-w8_NeWg_jnvif=ojXLR4XRfnNA>