From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 20 7:41:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81C537BE0A for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.40]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19984; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:38:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:38:32 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: Rahul Siddharthan Cc: Alexander Langer , Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs In-Reply-To: <20000420175141.B5893@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > Some things like multiple-level undo/redo work differently. > I like vim's way of doing that better. Depends what you're > used to, I suppose. But on vim, you can recover your unmodified > document by pressing u again and again: on nvi I think the ability > to recover past changes is more limited. :e! u should toggle changes. If you want multiple level undo, do it right, not by overloading basic functionality. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message