Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 02:04:40 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: d@delphij.net Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ? Message-ID: <201505210004.t4L04eIq082662@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Wed, 20 May 2015 15:48:23 -0700." <555D0F37.8040605@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Xin Li wrote: > On 05/20/15 14:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi security@freebsd.org > > Please note that security@freebsd.org = secteam@freebsd.org. Since > this is posted to ports@ which is public, I'm assuming it's not > intended to be in private. Yes, correct, thanks Xin Li, (Sorry I forgot that lack of naming alias, different to other [freebsd-](hackers|current|ports)@freebsd.org lists). Thanks for the quick response :-) PS I checked some finance sites (random, OS unknown) from a FreeBSD client, all failed with 'EXPORT', just 2 responded OK with 'ECDH' Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201505210004.t4L04eIq082662>