From owner-cvs-ports  Tue May 16 02:52:09 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA04966
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 16 May 1995 02:52:09 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA04959
          ; Tue, 16 May 1995 02:52:03 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id CAA05111; Tue, 16 May 1995 02:52:01 -0700
Date: Tue, 16 May 1995 02:52:01 -0700
Message-Id: <199505160952.CAA05111@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ache@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <199505160936.CAA04613@freefall.cdrom.com> (ache@freefall.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/tcp_wrapper/patches patch-aa
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 *   Modified:    net/tcp_wrapper/patches  patch-aa
 *   Log:
 *   Enable call of remote pindentd

Andrey, can you hold these kind of changes until the release goes out?
People are starting to test the ports, and having multiple versions
lying around is just confusing (not to mention that I have to rebuild
this package).

People, I requested that changes to the ports tree confined to bug
fixes only....

Thanks
Satoshi