From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 9 15:27: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [195.178.136.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F7B14EBB for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:27:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lx@hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: from hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (IDENT:0@eth0.hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [10.100.0.6]) by relay1.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (8.NYB/8.NYB) with ESMTP id BAA04399 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:26:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from lx@hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: from lx.hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (lx.hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua [10.100.23.72]) by hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (1.2.3.4/hidden) with ESMTP id BAA02864 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:26:40 +0200 (EET) Received: (from lx@localhost) by lx.hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (8.9.2/8.9.1) id BAA00588 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:26:40 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:26:40 +0200 From: Alexander Matey To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Static ARP again. kern/6432 revisited. Message-ID: <19990310012640.A545@hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> References: <19990310010540.A441@hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <19990310010540.A441@hosix.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>; from Alexander Matey on Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 01:05:40AM +0200 Organization: NTUU "KPI" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Just a quick note about if_ether.c.diff - please ignore the change to $Id$ in first hunk - the rest of this diff is current as of revision 1.52.2.1 of if_ether.c. On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 01:05:40AM +0200, Alexander Matey wrote: > Hello, > > I'm taking the courage :) to bring up the "static ARP on ethernet > interfaces" issue again. The audit trail of kern/6432 gives sufficient > background and I only want to refresh your memory by mentioning that all > this is about making -arp parameter of ifconfig(8) work for ethernet > interfaces. > > Attached are diffs for LINT, conf/options and netinet/if_ether.c > made against 3.1-STABLE cvsupped few hours ago. > > The purpose of STATIC_ARP_HACK option is covered in the LINT diff. > I tried to keep everything clean and straightforward. > > If someone could take time to review these diffs and comment on them > while paying special attention to the correctness of updated if_ether.c > I would be very grateful. > [..] -- Alexander Matey Kyiv, Ukraine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message