From owner-cvs-include Tue Nov 15 17:17:34 1994 Return-Path: cvs-include-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id RAA16948 for cvs-include-outgoing; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:17:34 -0800 Received: from bsd.coe.montana.edu (bsd.coe.montana.edu [153.90.192.29]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA16939; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:17:24 -0800 Received: (nate@localhost) by bsd.coe.montana.edu (8.6.8/8.3) id SAA10548; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 18:21:15 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 18:21:15 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199411160121.SAA10548@bsd.coe.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" "Re: cvs commit: src/include malloc.h Makefile" (Nov 15, 9:23pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" , CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-include@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include malloc.h Makefile Sender: cvs-include-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I don't need libmalloc for Linux/SYSV ports, just malloc.h only. > I also don't want to add -lmalloc to each such port, if > malloc.h included in libmalloc. If you are 100% shure that > libmalloc is beter than standard malloc, just replace malloc > in _standard_ libc and add additional things into malloc.h. I'm not 100% sure that it's bug-free. That's the problem. However, I'm 100% that it's more frugal with memory and almost as fast. Nate