Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer....
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomREO6uj_izmD%2Bp90cFn=AQcz7UbZNkX8PVnU5mG_8ufQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.wn4141f88527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl>
References:  <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> <1353513692.69940.7.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50ACFC6C.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <50AD0E82.3070706@digiware.nl> <20121121194142.8c4bf7d1977f13801a021ccc@getmail.no> <op.wn4141f88527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
.. because some of us like kernel behaviour to be predictable and
controllable, rather than 'just be dynamic here, what could possibly
go wrong.'

Just bump the default kernel buffer size up to 64k and leave it
hard-coded like that. Us embedded people can drop that down to
something smaller.

There. Problem solved, right?



adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomREO6uj_izmD%2Bp90cFn=AQcz7UbZNkX8PVnU5mG_8ufQ>