From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 29 14:20:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate.program-products.co.uk (samson.program-products.co.uk [212.240.242.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D4315922 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:20:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from terry@program-products.co.uk) Received: by mailgate.program-products.co.uk via smap (V2.1) id xma033081; Mon, 29 Mar 99 23:20:15 +0100 To: dg@root.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FIN not sent on socket close() References: <199903292006.MAA09583@implode.root.com> From: Terry Glanfield Date: 29 Mar 1999 23:20:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: David Greenman's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:06:11 -0800" Message-Id: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.44/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Greenman writes: > >The only difference I can see is that the proxy is being launched from > >inetd. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Source code available > >on request. > > Hmmm, inetd opens the network connection on stdin/stdout/stderr (descriptors > 0, 1, and 2) for the server that it execs. If this is the same socket that > your application is using, then those would have to be closed, too. Sorry, I think inetd was a wild goose chase. I've launched the proxy as a daemon rather then from inetd with the same problem. Terry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message