From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 28 4:54:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD34237BE8F for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 04:54:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 12ZvVP-000CLE-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:53:59 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA04251; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:53:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:53:55 +0100 From: J McKitrick To: Martin Cracauer Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amazon email response Message-ID: <20000328135355.B4211@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20000328115433.A11980@cons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000328115433.A11980@cons.org>; from cracauer@cons.org on Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 11:54:33AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, martin, you certainly make some good points. I guess i will just adopt a wait-and-see attitude. I appreciate that they want to fight only against BN, but they still cost millions by requiring other websites to re-tool or risk lawsuit. It's a tough call.And it's too soon to say. We'll see if Jeff means what he says or if he just realizes he can't pull the wool over the computer community's eyes. jm -- -------------------------------------------- Jonathon McKitrick -- jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org The spice must flow.... -------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message