From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 8 18:31:28 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE3C1526C for ; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:31:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id DAA29549 for cvs-all@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 03:31:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA59492 for cvs-all@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 02:38:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssl Makefile ports/security/openssl/patches patch-ab ports/security/openssl/pkg PLIST Date: 9 Nov 1999 02:38:52 +0100 Message-ID: <807tvc$1q2m$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <199911072219.OAA16209@freefall.freebsd.org> To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Build and install shared libraries libcrypto.so.1 and libssl.so.1, too. > > Err, is this a good idea? I thought the reason openssl didn't build shared > libraries by default was because the code doesn't work properly in that > case, and this is something they're currently addressing. I realize this is hardly exhaustive, but as a first indicator: lynx-ssl, w3m-ssl, and openssh built with openssl's shared libs seem to be working fine. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message