From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 08:11:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 8BB0216A4CF; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:11:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:11:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050318081131.GA80612@FreeBSD.org> References: <20050318055212.GA70385@FreeBSD.org> <20050318061647.GA40922@VARK.MIT.EDU> <423A7277.1000202@samsco.org> <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com> <423A89B9.1040601@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <423A89B9.1040601@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: das@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Warner Losh Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:11:31 -0000 On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:56:41AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > >>You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls > >>around!! I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that > >>supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2. Ugh. We > >>need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again. > > > > > >6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3 > > > >Warner > > No, 5.3 has libm.so.3. 6.0-RELEASE had better have libm.so.4 Well, if David finds enought reasons (after this discussion) to bump so version number, I think it's still better to go off with cleaner and "less-hacky" code. ./danfe