From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 13:18:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from web20022.mail.yahoo.com (web20022.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB1DD43D2D for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kusmiantoro@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040220211816.61131.qmail@web20022.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.145.233.34] by web20022.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:16 PST Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:16 -0800 (PST) From: Budi Kusmiantoro To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_DEL): Invalid argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kusmiantoro@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:18:17 -0000 Hello... ipfw allows user to specify a list of rules in a file and then access it with an absolute path. example: ipfw /etc/rules Deleting a non-existent rule will make the ipfw stops processing the file immediately. May be I am missing something here, but I still don't see the reason why deleting a non-existent rule is considered to be a stopper. Is there any security impact if we let the ipfw keeps continue processing the rest of the file? /Budi __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools