From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Dec  6 08:25:58 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11327
          for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 08:25:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from unox.student.tue.nl (unox.student.tue.nl [131.155.210.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA11321
          for <smp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 08:25:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from marcelk@stack.nl)
Received: (from marcelk@localhost) by unox.student.tue.nl (8.9.1/8.8.8) id RAA11351 for smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:25:49 +0100
Message-ID: <19981206172549.A11335@unox.student.tue.nl>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 17:25:49 +0100
From: Marcel van Kervinck <marcelk@stack.nl>
To: smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Pthreads and SMP
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hello,

Perhaps I've missed something obvious  But: it seems to me that a process
that uses multiple threads doesn't spread them over more processors?
I tried on a dual PII, running fbsd 3.0, and a program that simply did
a few pthread_create() calls.

Kind regards,

	Marcel
--  _   _
  _| |_|_|
 |_    |_     marcelk@stack.nl
         |_|  Marcel van Kervinck

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message