From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Feb 15 22:21:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7217ECDFE3F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4351F1D4F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c7so4700071itd.1 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:21:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDxhwfn13rOa10oA+LjQTfCwIbloSk6SwmaJCgm7vq4=; b=SAKa3NwFVzVV7qFdVdBZf1yKysa/K3TAg2ui459qoazLaV60Qn6loadtYf/UTZFRNf jb8aVDgINpm5EeAywwR61Zq/Y8NwsE4MWQ+aT+8TjUGvM5Z42q1P5ObA17ClyZavV0FJ lmcCcg9m52q/AaCdfg5BzfbdYfM9NVdxC0hMJNrzQePt+eB5B5p77txxqCk8xXczGNuk uPXOJorC6ujBBSIh4G+Z3fdyxOIr44ED8zHbvw7YAw3cSGp3nCDDSkQ9QxcTndWS8NpI Wd6b4CFFgE7YdwXFbO1B/trHRJIBVcFHIlwaDrD3GsBGZZiD82OuGqqip9HluQ0nnFVP nNUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vDxhwfn13rOa10oA+LjQTfCwIbloSk6SwmaJCgm7vq4=; b=p+xgvM8KVvKGeyXn2CRD7OXlLiNWO9gBejiS5tiZFk5fmdHKeBVY3R+aAr+nWkCb4K 4ljniXQKQag4sCAieD+2lN9iT+1AMjiCjfS43MTbvxg5CdRNKSn28TipGlpUc/dyIEn8 r276aRJMcT4KtJqXhG+0U8SwWUWyBTlfxMRjGTCtIyYHhnR04+FvGFmLCAOlPXIqr97f fu9554FFyWS5RwMfOGHYKsMEn6BLNomz+SmqhFuJuVyufIiNln3j14G4jwgZY2eGmuil nvUMdXmrIIlMywJMKZ0Bo+sDSCpzdvYDdLEJDSGj6ZTMf2dqdZsTb1oY95eaKf3/jk2w IGyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nng75jJwy93ajCK7f9nnkqkhKbP0B3YZj4/Y2WFjQQPYNJrOaaqmDLFO86G3nzVg== X-Received: by 10.36.93.213 with SMTP id w204mr11922469ita.60.1487197315559; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-24-165-207-226.neo.res.rr.com. [24.165.207.226]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p124sm2353363ioe.37.2017.02.15.14.21.54 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:21:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58A4D488.20709@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:22:00 -0500 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: vimage and ipv4 addresses Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:21:56 -0000 Testing RELEASE 11.0 vimage. Using the bridge/epair method to configure network access for vnet jails. Issuing "ifconfig epairXb ipv4-address" command. A single ip address works fine, but if I say 10.0.10.2,10.10.10.3 I get error saying "bad value" If I issue the ifconfig command two times, once using each ip address then only the last ip address issued shows on the epairxb ifconfig list in the vnet jail. Is this telling me that a vnet jail can only have a single ipv4 ip address? Is the syntax of the command incorrect? On the other hand doing basically the same thing with ipv6 does not work that way. If I issue "ifconfig epairXb int6 ipv6-address" using a single ipv6 ip address it works fine, but if I say fc00::2,fc00::3 I get error saying "bad value" If I issue the ifconfig command two times, once using each ip address then both ipv6 address issued shows on the epairxb ifconfig list in the vnet jail. Any input greatly appreciated