Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To:        Gary Clark II <gclarkii@main.gbdata.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Strange error on Freefall
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.94.960917104522.5516B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <199609171514.KAA16313@main.gbdata.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Gary Clark II wrote:

> hello,
> 
> I was on FreeFall earlier and ran into the following problem:
> 
> freefall:gclarkii# ping srimain.srisoft.com
> PING srimain.srisoft.com (207.90.208.225): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 207.90.208.225: icmp_seq=0 ttl=238 time=188.854 ms
> 64 bytes from 207.90.208.225: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=209.467 ms
> ^C
> --- srimain.srisoft.com ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 33% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 188.854/199.160/209.467 ms
> 
> freefall:gclarkii# telnet srimain.srisoft.com
> Trying 198.66.103.161...
> freefall:gclarkii#                          
> 
> Why does the DNS return both variables consistly, one to ping
> and the other to telnet and rlogin???
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Gary

 That system has two addresses.  The DNS server will return the address
list in a different order for each query.  ping uses the first address in
the list.  telnet tries to be smart and tries to search the list for an
address that will work.

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.94.960917104522.5516B-100000>