From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  2 05:53:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E6816A41F
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 05:53:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from josh@tcbug.org)
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8F243D5D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 05:53:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from josh@tcbug.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.101]
	(c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219])
	by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
	id <20051202055310015004d6pfe>; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 05:53:10 +0000
From: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:53:08 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200512012353.08202.josh@tcbug.org>
Cc: 
Subject: USB 2.0 (somewhat OT)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:53:13 -0000

Just wondering why USB 2.x support isn't in the GENERIC kernel on 
5.4-RELEASE

-- 
Thanks,

Josh Paetzel