Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:30:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: autotools@FreeBSD.org Subject: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING Message-ID: <21435330.67421284593438967.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've just run portupgrade -ap, after getting the new autotools and reading UPDATING. >From what I can understand, as it's not a version bump but a new port (I realized it too late...). So maybe I should have used something like: # portupgrade -o devel/autoconf267 autoconf262 Am I wrong? If not, maybe a note in UPDATING should be needed. Now I have: $ pkg_info -Ix autoconf-2.6 autoconf-2.62 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.67 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms And about the dependencies: $ pkg_info -Rx autoconf-2.67 Information for autoconf-2.67: $ pkg_info -Rx autoconf-2.62 Information for autoconf-2.62: Required by: automake-1.10.3 automake-1.11.1 automake-1.4.6_6 automake-1.5_6,1 automake-1.6.3_2 automake-1.7.9_3 automake-1.8.5_4 automake-1.9.6_4 autotools-20100915 So it seems that all the rebuilt ports depends on autoconf-2.62 and so I don't know anymore which were the ports bumped for the dependency with the new version to rebuild it after removing autoconf-2.62. Barbara
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21435330.67421284593438967.JavaMail.defaultUser>