From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 16 14:55:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E378C159C3 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:55:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id GAA03181; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 06:52:46 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3717B0C2.9C61D788@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 06:50:58 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Dean Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local References: <199904162129.OAA93936@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thomas Dean wrote: > > I see the latest /etc/defaults/rc.conf will include either or both of > /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local. > > I only want to have one. > > Which is going to stay with us the longest? /etc/rc.conf, though rc.conf.local is not likely to go away. The former is the "do your stuff" standard file. The later is a machine-specific override when you have a standard rc.conf for many machines, and need to tweak specific parameters in a few. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message