From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Dec 14 13:39:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC35DE8052A; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD5663F4A; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 16FED1AFCA; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:39:55 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Linimon Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456197 - in head/net: istgt py-beanstalkc Message-ID: <20171214133955.GC51526@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712130844.vBD8iFtf060010@repo.freebsd.org> <20171213085412.vltifyke37rwntft@ivaldir.net> <20171213090441.GA45323@FreeBSD.org> <20171213174651.GA96646@FreeBSD.org> <20171214005638.GB7123@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171214005638.GB7123@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:39:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:56:38PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:46:51PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > as an 8.4-STABLE user, I'm not so happy to see a working port go > > August 1, 2015 was 8.4 EOL per > > https://www.freebsd.org/security/unsupported.html > > e.g. 28.5 months ago. > > IIUC anyone who still runs 8.4 assumes the entire burden of support. You missed the point entirely Mark. ./danfe