From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 19 15:15:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B20799; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lmtp.galacsys.net (webmail.galacsys.net [IPv6:2001:1b78:0:1:d918:51d7:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0503776C; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from martymac.org (webmail.galacsys.net [217.24.81.215]) by lmtp.galacsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2647F1FA5D46; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:15:11 +0200 (CEST) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r316102 - in head/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel: . files X-Openwebmail-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:15:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20130419150333.M65185@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org> References: <201304191335.r3JDZF4B031649@svn.freebsd.org> <20130419134935.GA29457@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.01 20030425 X-OriginatingIP: 88.163.147.236 (ganael.laplanche@martymac.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:15:12 -0000 On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:49:35 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote Hi Alexey, > I would say this is rather bogus BROKEN message: it's totally > unclear what exactly "i386-specific option" is: assembler > instruction, compiler option, or something else. This is an old one that has been re-ordered, see : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/emulators/dolphin-emu-devel/Makefile.diff?r1=1.2;r2=1.3 and to be honest, I am not sure whether Dolphin is still BROKEN or not on PowerPC, as it should now be buildable on (e.g.) Android devices too. > This is not only bad because perhaps NOT_FOR_ARCHS might suit > better in this case, but also because it does not encourage > some brave soul who might pass by this port to attempt to fix > it. Vague hints tend to give these "oh well, maybe later" feelings. To encourage people to test the port on other archs, maybe something like : ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= Has only been tested on i386 and amd64 would be more explicit ? Best regards, -- Ganael LAPLANCHE http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac , http://www.FreeBSD.org