Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:51:59 -0500
From:      Mike Karels <karels@karels.net>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet 
Message-ID:  <200707201252.l6KCpx7G033770@redrock.karels.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:46:47 -0700. <469EDEA7.9000606@elischer.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mike Karels wrote:
> >> There are also things to consider such as if a GigE card is connected to 
> >> a GigE device (switch/card etc) and the card supports jumbo frames 
> >> should the MRU be set to the max jumbo receive size for the card? This 
> >> could cause confusion when people plug jumbo capable devices in with 
> >> hardware limitations making the MRU lower than other devices on the network.
> > 
> > Although we don't have an MRU explicitly, we don't enable reception
> > of jumbo frames without administrator action.  There is an IFCAP_JUMBO_MTU
> > flag defined, but not previously used as far as I know.  We added the
> > ability to set that flag with ifconfig, which enables reception of
> > jumbo frames without changing the MTU.  Then, in ether_input, we accept
> > any packet that a NIC sees fit to receive.

> for what values of "we"?

Sorry, that's Secure Computing.  I was elaborating on a change I had
mentioned earlier.

		Mike



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707201252.l6KCpx7G033770>