Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:19:14 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 214338] devel/glib20: patch: new kqueue() backend for file monitoring
Message-ID:  <bug-214338-6497-XNf7prYijv@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-214338-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-214338-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214338

Vladimir Kondratyev <wulf@cicgroup.ru> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wulf@cicgroup.ru

--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Kondratyev <wulf@cicgroup.ru> ---
(In reply to rozhuk.im from comment #0)
> - no additional threads created

Just wondering. Is it safe to call readdir() from glib worker thread contex=
t?
Are there any chances that glib-based application would just freeze if
readdir() would take tooooo looong time to complete?

I don`t know much about glib internals, that is why I am asking

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214338-6497-XNf7prYijv>