From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 16 18:25:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D72F16A402 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outM.internet-mail-service.net (outM.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7552613C48D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:25:12 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54904125AE6; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <469BB821.1010507@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:25:37 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <20070705122650.GE1302@britannica.bec.de> <468E16E6.6030608@delphij.net> <20070706112453.GA3217@hoeg.nl> <468E7007.5050607@elischer.org> <20070715211549.GB39075@hoeg.nl> <469AB30A.5000001@elischer.org> <20070716113425.GC65937@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20070716113425.GC65937@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: add closefrom() call X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:25:13 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Jul-15 16:51:38 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> void >>> closefrom(int lowfd) >>> { >>> fcntl(lowfd, F_CLOSEM, NULL); >>> } >> what on earth would that achieve? >> (as opposed to just a simple syscall) > > The only benefit I can think of is minimising the number of syscalls. > Is there any other benefit? > I don't think so.. it's less efficient, and harder to do.. syscalls are not in short supply.