Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:38:11 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
To:        pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why so many ghostscript ports?
Message-ID:  <199901112238.OAA86617@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <369A5BF8.F18C9545@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> (pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * My GNU ghostcript port was committed (thanks!), but I see in the web
 * that we still have two older versions that IMHO should be nuked...

You're probably right.  Does anyone have objections to nuking
ghostscript (version 2) and ghostscript4, now that we have GNU
ghostscript5 and Alladin ghostscript55?

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901112238.OAA86617>