From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Aug 19 14:45:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F56B37B400 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B50343E4A for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:45:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hades.hell.gr (patr530-a134.otenet.gr [212.205.215.134]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7JLjVkH020376; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:45:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from hades.hell.gr (hades [127.0.0.1]) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7JLjTq2004059; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:45:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from charon@localhost) by hades.hell.gr (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7JLjTgg004057; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:45:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:45:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Josh Paetzel Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/20028 ASCII docs should reflect tags Message-ID: <20020819214526.GB3837@hades.hell.gr> References: <1029168527.229.27.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1029168527.229.27.camel@heater.vladsempire.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: C1EB 0653 DB8B A557 3829 00F9 D60F 941A 3186 03B6 X-Phone: +30-944-116520 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 2002-08-12 16:08 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I'm willing to take a shot at tackling this, assuming it's a real > problem that really needs fixing. It would also be nice to have some > input as to what a good ASCII emphasis tag would be. The author of the > pr suggests *this is emphasized*. Is that acceptable or is this subject > to discussion/debate/flamages? :) This style of emphasizing looks okay. There will probably be problems when one tries to emphasize a single `*' character, as in: * but this should not stop you from trying to make the ASCII docs look better. First we need something that works, then we can refine it if/when such problems appear. Giorgos --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9YWb11g+UGjGGA7YRArXFAJ4yNeFHmoJCM123cJfS/SnURJTV8wCghPyV tmGIPMpsZykaBW5c5hZ6rv4= =fQxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message