From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Aug 26 04:34:41 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA13652
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:34:41 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA13642
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:34:40 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA02000; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:34:32 -0700
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 1995 04:34:32 -0700
Message-Id: <199508261134.EAA02000@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <28772.809436673@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: `make info'?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > Speaking of the toplevel, may I delete GUIDELINES?  It is obsolete, I
 * > have no intentions (nor the time) to update it, people should refer to 
 * > the handbook anyway....
 * 
 * Assuming that we replace it with a system like this, I have no
 * objection.

Uhh, GUIDELINES was for porters, not users...so this system is not
going to "replace" it....

Satoshi