From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 24 18:53:43 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA20837 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.id.net (root@shell.id.net [199.125.1.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA20828 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 18:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rls@localhost) by shell.id.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA15557; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:54:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Shady Message-Id: <199608250154.VAA15557@shell.id.net> Subject: Re: 128k ISDN vs. T1 To: jsuter@bsd.intrastar.net (Jacob Suter) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Cc: ulf@Lamb.net, kyricc@inetnebr.com, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from Jacob Suter at "Aug 24, 96 01:52:37 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Sorry to be rude, but another "Wanna-be-ISP". First it looks like you should > go and read more about what is possible in telecommunication hardware. > Like that ISDN is not upgradable over that 128K. That there exist Fractional > T1. Frame Relay. And so on and so on. Well, obviously another clueless "thinks-he's-an-isp"... Ever hear of ISDN PRI? We're running 23 channels of ISDN here, works rather well... -- Rob === _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ Innovative Data Services Serving South-Eastern Michigan Internet Service Provider / Hardware Sales / Consulting Services Voice: (810)855-0404 / Fax: (810)855-3268 / Web: http://www.id.net