Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:32:03 +0100 From: Denny Schierz <linuxmail@4lin.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about network virtualization for jails? Message-ID: <8DC79843-9CF8-4C49-B871-0B0BB591B95C@4lin.net> In-Reply-To: <CADt0fhxb1BBRpV2yKuTxsYBU77P1cBFp13vF18AaZJNjNS=ujg@mail.gmail.com> References: <E9D8DF08-8E15-4E95-9953-E1EF4E3D8044@4lin.net> <CADt0fhxb1BBRpV2yKuTxsYBU77P1cBFp13vF18AaZJNjNS=ujg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] hi Shawn, Am 25.11.2011 um 16:54 schrieb Shawn Webb: > Yes. You can use VIMAGE/vnet with jails. In fact, I just blogged about > how to set it up: > > http://0xfeedface.org/blog/2011-11-21/lattera/freebsd-vnet-jail-admin-project > > I'm also writing a php project that will help administer FreeBSD jails: > > https://github.com/lattera/jailadmin that's extremely cool :-) I will test it the next days, with our most important services. Does the new features-set make any differences for NFS server in a jail? I want to switch from two Solaris 10 NFS servers to FreeBSD Jails. At the moment I know only, that this is bad idea, because of kernel problems. User-space NFS is also no way, to serve as NFS Server for 130 NFS (Linux) clients, booting there "/" over NFS. cu denny [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAk7P+0QACgkQKlzhkqt9P+CzswCfW76LPpnPqSYjz/UGes9CFp53 4MQAn1zX9jVoq+hmGwsVC809RbOhnPHW =gJQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8DC79843-9CF8-4C49-B871-0B0BB591B95C>