From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 01:03:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D38F16A4B3 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from snow.fingers.co.za (snow.fingers.co.za [196.7.148.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730C943F93 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:03:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fingers@fingers.co.za) Received: by snow.fingers.co.za (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 529501706D; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:03:48 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snow.fingers.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DBF1703E for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:03:48 +0200 (SAST) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:03:48 +0200 (SAST) From: fingers To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031027085357.GA9723@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20031027110310.F5852@snow.fingers.co.za> References: <20031027080240.GA9552@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031027085357.GA9723@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Best way to filter "Nachi pings"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:03:52 -0000 > Only if you block all ICMP packets, which is not what I suggested. does windows tracert not specifically use 92 byte icmp echo-requests? (8/0)